Political neutrality in the audit profession: attitudes of respondents in the Republic of Serbia

Main Article Content

Nemanja Jakovljević

Abstract

Political neutrality represents independence from the political activities, as well as from all other activities that can be considered subordinated to direct or indirect political influence. At the individual level, there are two concepts of political neutrality. The subject of this paper is research on the attitudes of respondents engaged in audit profession on political neutrality and challenges to political neutrality. The research was conducted through a survey distributed to the addresses of persons engaged in audit profession in the Republic of Serbia. The main conclusion is that it is necessary to reconsider certain measures to improve the awareness of persons engaged in audit profession on political neutrality, its importance, threats that may violate political neutrality, and protection measures that can be taken at the individual and collective level to preserve political neutrality and audit firms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jakovljević, N. (2021). Political neutrality in the audit profession: attitudes of respondents in the Republic of Serbia. BizInfo (Blace) Journal of Economics, Management and Informatics, 12(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.5937/bizinfo2102023J
Section
Articles

References

Amin, K., Kim, C., Yang, Z., & Ye, F. (2021). Politically connected boards and audit pricing: US Evidence. Accounting Horizons, 35(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-18-157

Avwokeni, A. J. (2016). Cultural resistance, output measures, and audit practice: impact on non-implementation of program-based budgeting in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 909-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1057850

Badaracco C. (1988). The Politics of Communication Audits, Public Relations Quarterly, 33(3), 27-32;

Bradney, A. (2001). The Quality Assurance Agency and the politics of audit. Journal of Law and Society, 28(3), 430-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00197

Kodeks ponašanja državnih službenika. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 29/2008, 30/2015, 20/2018, 42/2018, 80/2019 i 32/2020;

Etički kodeks za državne revizore i druge zaposlene u Državnoj revizorskoj instituciji. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 44/2009;

Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1-2), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.005

Grasso, P. G., & Sharkansky, I. (2001). The auditing of public policy and the politics of auditing: The US GAO and Israel's state comptroller. Governance, 14(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00149

Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., & Tremblay, M. S. (2015). On the operational reality of auditors' independence: Lessons from the field. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 201-236. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50905

Hornbeck, D., & Malin, J. (2019). State auditors in education policy. Educational Policy, 33(7), 1047-1075. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0895904818755469

Malsch, B., & Morin, D. (2017). Legislative audit, at the frontiers of power and politics. Accounting Auditing Control, 23(1), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.231.0075

McGrogan, D. (2018). The population and the individual: The human rights audit as the governmentalization of global human rights governance. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 1073-1100. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy086

Namakavarani, O. M., Daryaei, A. A., Askarany, D., & Askary, S. (2021). Audit Committee Characteristics and Quality of Financial Information: The Role of the Internal Information Environment and Political Connections. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(6), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14060273

Power, M. (1993). The politics of financial auditing. The Political Quarterly, 64(3), 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1993.tb00344.x

Scwartz, R., & Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, R. (2002). The politics of accountability: Institutionalising internal auditing in Israel. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(3), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00151

Sian, S., Agrizzi, D., Wright, T., & Alsalloom, A. (2020). Negotiating constraints in international audit firms in Saudi Arabia: exploring the interaction of gender, politics and religion. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 84, 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101103

Sutopo, B., Wulandari, T. R., Adiati, A. K., & Saputra, D. A. (2017). E-government, audit opinion, and performance of local government administration in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(4), 6-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i4.2

Usang Edet Usang, O., & Salim, B. (2018). The relationship between institutional environment, internal audit and performance of local governments in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Finance (IJAF), 7(2), 120-147.

Wahab, E. A. A., Zain, M. M., & James, K. (2011). Political connections, corporate governance and audit fees in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111129562